Last updated: May 2026 — James Wilson, Ruspav

How We Rate

Our Review Methodology at Ruspav

At Ruspav (ruspav.com), every casino and betting platform review you read is the product of a rigorous, hands-on evaluation process. Our mission is simple: to give players in Uzbekistan honest, reliable, and independently verified information about online betting sites so they can make informed decisions. This page explains exactly how we work, what we look for, and why you can trust the scores we publish.

Who Does the Reviewing

All reviews on Ruspav are personally conducted by James Wilson, the site's founder and lead analyst. James has spent years studying the online gambling industry across Central Asian and international markets. Before any review is published, James creates a real account on the platform, makes actual deposits using methods available to UZ players, claims bonuses, plays games, contacts customer support, and attempts a withdrawal. No review is written from the outside looking in — every rating reflects genuine, first-person experience.

James does not accept payment from operators to write favorable reviews. No casino or betting site can purchase a higher score on Ruspav. This independence is the foundation of everything we do.

Our Step-by-Step Review Process

Each OnlyBets review and any comparable platform review follows a consistent, repeatable process:

• Step 1 — Registration: James registers a new account using standard credentials available to players in Uzbekistan, verifying how smooth and transparent the sign-up process is.
• Step 2 — Verification: Identity and document verification procedures are tested to assess speed and ease of the KYC process.
• Step 3 — Deposit Testing: Multiple payment methods relevant to the UZ market are tested with real funds to evaluate processing times, fees, and reliability.
• Step 4 — Bonus Claiming: Welcome bonuses and promotions are activated and their terms carefully read and analyzed against industry standards.
• Step 5 — Gameplay: A cross-section of available games — including slots, live casino, and sports betting — is played to assess quality, fairness indicators, and software performance.
• Step 6 — Mobile Testing: The platform is accessed on both Android and iOS devices to evaluate the mobile experience independently of the desktop version.
• Step 7 — Support Contact: Customer support is contacted via all available channels (live chat, email, phone) with real questions, and response times and quality are recorded.
• Step 8 — Withdrawal: A withdrawal is requested to confirm that payout processes work as advertised.
• Step 9 — Scoring: All gathered data is applied to our weighted scoring criteria and a final score is calculated.

Rating Criteria and Weightings

Every platform is scored across six core categories. Each category carries a specific weight that reflects its importance to the overall player experience. Scores within each category are awarded from 1 to 10, then multiplied by the category weight to produce a weighted score. All weighted scores are combined to produce a final rating out of 10.

Category	Weight	What We Evaluate
Licensing & Safety	25%	Valid gambling license, SSL encryption, responsible gambling tools, fair terms
Bonuses & Promotions	20%	Welcome offer value, wagering requirements, ongoing promotions, transparency of terms
Game Selection	20%	Variety of games, quality of software providers, RTP availability, live casino options
Payment Methods	15%	Available deposit and withdrawal options for UZ players, processing speed, fees, limits
Customer Support	10%	Availability hours, response time, quality of answers, language support
Mobile Experience	10%	Dedicated app availability, mobile browser performance, interface usability on small screens

Understanding Our Rating Scale

Final scores are presented on a scale of 1 to 10, where higher numbers indicate a better overall experience. Here is how to interpret each score range:

• 9.0 – 10.0 — Excellent: Outstanding across all categories. Highly recommended for UZ players.
• 7.5 – 8.9 — Very Good: Strong performance with only minor shortcomings.
• 6.0 – 7.4 — Good: Solid platform with notable areas that could be improved.
• 4.0 – 5.9 — Average: Meets basic standards but has significant weaknesses.
• Below 4.0 — Poor: Fails to meet expected standards. Not recommended.

How Ruspav Stays Unbiased

Maintaining editorial independence is non-negotiable at Ruspav. Here is how we protect the integrity of our reviews:

• No paid placements: Operators cannot pay to improve their rating or appear higher in any listing on ruspav.com.
• Affiliate transparency: Ruspav may earn a commission if a reader signs up through a link on this site. This never influences the score a platform receives. Commissions are earned after honest evaluation, not before it.
• Regular re-evaluation: Reviews are revisited and updated when a platform makes significant changes to its terms, games, or policies. A score published in 2026 reflects conditions as tested in 2026.
• Reader feedback: Player reports and complaints submitted to Ruspav are taken seriously and can trigger a re-review if there is evidence that actual conditions differ from what was tested.

Questions About Our Methodology

If you have questions about how a specific score was calculated, or if you believe a review needs to be updated based on your experience, you are encouraged to reach out directly through the contact page at ruspav.com. James Wilson reads all incoming messages and takes player feedback seriously as part of keeping Ruspav's content accurate and trustworthy.